In the face of the new coronavirus pandemic, it is a tragedy not to have a vaccine; it is another tragedy for a vaccine to be ineffective or ineffective; it is an even greater tragedy for a vaccine to be proven effective but the public does not dare to believe it. Compiled by Xiaoyu and Idobon Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said Pfizer will not be influenced by politics and will not "take shortcuts" in vaccine development. In a few weeks, the first phase III clinical trial data of the COVID-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer Pharmaceuticals may be released, which will undoubtedly give a shot in the arm to the global population trapped in the epidemic. However, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla published an open letter last week, warning that the political pressure on the vaccine is getting more and more serious as it gets closer to success. The open letter stated that Pfizer began to develop vaccines quickly in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and mobilized all resources to achieve its goal. Pfizer has invested $2 billion in vaccine research and development and expects to report early efficacy data later this month. However, "in a year of extremely fierce partisan competition, some people want us to move faster, while others advocate delaying progress." “Neither of these options is acceptable to me,” Bourla said. On September 29, US President Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Biden debated the vaccine development process and the issue of "politics influencing scientific decision-making." Bourla said he found it "disappointing" that the two used political rhetoric rather than scientific facts when discussing COVID-19 prevention. In order to cope with the severe threat of the new coronavirus, many pharmaceutical companies have started to develop vaccines early. Pfizer and its partner BioNTech quickly conducted early research and advanced to the Phase III clinical trial in July. It is expected that by the end of October, it will know whether the vaccine is effective. But the study was conducted during the U.S. presidential campaign, and President Trump has repeatedly said he expects a vaccine to be available by the end of the year or earlier. Concerns that politics could interfere with the progress of vaccine development have affected public trust in vaccines. A recent Pew survey showed that if a new coronavirus vaccine was available now, only 51% of Americans would choose to get the vaccine, while 49% would not get it, and more than three-quarters (78%) believed that the vaccine development process would be moved too fast. Just before the presidential debate, a group of scientists jointly wrote a letter to Bourla [1], stating that "science-based, rigorous safety standards" are crucial to vaccine development, and requested Pfizer to wait until the end of November to obtain more data on safe use of the drug - that is, after the volunteers received the second dose of the vaccine, before submitting an emergency application to the FDA. Bourla wrote in the open letter that the lethality of the new coronavirus and humanity's urgent need for vaccines are driving Pfizer to "move at the speed of science," and the company will not be influenced by politics and "will never take shortcuts." “The only pressure we feel — and it’s heavy — comes from the hundreds of millions of people, millions of businesses and hundreds of government officials who rely on us.” "I appreciate vigorous policy debates, but I'm not a politician. I'm a scientist, a business leader, a husband, a father, a friend and neighbor to many people, and I care deeply about whether future vaccines are reliable. Right now, a lot of political rhetoric is surrounding vaccine development, research progress, and political achievements, which are undermining public confidence in vaccines. I can't predict when our vaccine will be approved by the FDA, or even if it will be approved. But I know that if we stop talking about when the vaccine will be delivered from a political perspective and focus on rigorous, independent scientific evaluation and a firm, independent approval process, the world will be a safer place." Bourla asked people to imagine that if we had a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine, but the presidential debate made people mistrust the vaccine - this would be a more complicated tragedy. “This is unacceptable to any of us,” he wrote. References [1] https://aboutblaw.com/TnB This article is translated from https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/pfizer-ceo-bourla-warns-about-politics-threatening-coronavirus-vaccine-uptake |
<<: Can steamed sea bass be eaten overnight? When is the best season to eat Songjiang sea bass?
>>: What is the difference between sea bass and freshwater bass? How to gut sea bass
A patient asked in a private message. The patient...
Generally, if there is no trauma in the shoulder ...
Star fruit has high nutritional value, contains m...
Parse.ly released a new report "Changes in S...
What is Sjögren's syndrome? Experts say the c...
Everyone who has double eyelid surgery will encou...
199IT original compilation A survey in February 2...
As people's health awareness improves, more a...
Everyone needs to improve their health awareness....
We all know that toilets are a common household i...
Many women in life have the problem of sagging br...
I believe everyone is familiar with pelvic inflam...
After vulvar itching occurs, many women will choo...
After birth, the baby needs to rely on the mother...
Oral ulcer is a common phenomenon in life. Many p...